The End


[Sopranos spoilers follow.]

The biggest spoiler was, in fact, that there was no spoiler. Given that Tony getting killed and Tony getting arrested both seemed likely, to read in the Sydney Morning Herald that “perhaps this story should come with a spoiler alert, except that it was far from clear what was going to happen to Tony and his family,” was to find out beforehand that at least one of those things didn’t happen.

It was, overall, a satisfying final episode to a great series. In hindsight, the family having dinner together was both the most predictable and the most fitting end.

It’s hard to like the very end, though, the build-up that something was going to happen, then the cut to black. It was a gimmick. Apparently creator David Chase thought it was a very clever ending, that no show on the networks would ever allow. Unfortunately, the inconclusive ending is the cliche TV series finish, on account of the brutal creative economics of television in which producers can never be sure if they’re going to come back for another series or not.

The inconclusive ending to end all inconclusive endings was David Lynch’s finale to Twin Peaks. [Spoilers follow.] The show having been cancelled, he rewrote the last episode as a deliberately infuriating cliffhanger in which half the cast seemed to be killed in an explosion and the protagonist was possessed by the bad guy. Now that was a statement against the limits placed on art by commerce.

For all the excellence of the HBO dramas (and, with Entourage, the comedies), which do in fact depend on their having less short-term dependence on ratings, HBO has yet to show it can beat television’s most serious literary limitation and allow a series to end properly. Carnivale was cancelled on a cliffhanger. Deadwood has been left hanging.

Now, unfortunately, even if that’s not the intention, The Sopranos ends as if the creators think they just might be able to make a movie and continue the storyline.

Update: For a more positive reading of the ending, which I have some sympathy for, see this interesting essay by Larry Gross. As Gross says, though, the Sopranos‘ strengths have not been in formal innovation, so the last moment of the series is an odd time to whip out the Brechtian estrangement.

Published in: on 13 June, 2007 at 9:36 am  Comments (5)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. One of the things I like about this episode is not the ending, which drives home the inconclusiveness, but the inconclusiveness of the whole piece. It doesn’t wrap up anything. Meadow is still in higher education; AJ has a new menial job; Paulie refuses to take more responsibility in the crew (where is this sub-plot going? Nowhere in particular); Sil is still in intensive care; Janice has to find a new husband; Tony is about to be indicted on relatively minor charges (again).

  2. That’s true. I did like the episode as a whole.

    I think they tried to do something similar at the end of Season 5, when they quite deliberately ramped up the tension only to have nothing happen.

    I think I’ll write more about the Sopranos soon… we’ve been going back to watch the old episodes again – watched the first two series so far, and it’s amazingly consistent. Like the AJ subplot in series 2 (where he quotes Nietzsche, gets told by grandma “it’s all a big nothing” etc) echoes in this latest series. And hospitals, cancers and dementias all the way through.

  3. I just rewatched the finale. Dialogue:

    Tony: Long story short, it’s about a private detective who gets sucked into the internet through his, er, data-port, and he’s got to . . . solve some murders of some virtual prostitutes.
    Carmella: I read it – it’s scary.

  4. Haha. Now this may be taking things too far, but that movie idea bears a certain resemblance to another TV great, the BBC’s Singing Detective – private detective in a fantasy world where he tries to solve some murders of virtual prostitutes. The murders are never solved by the show’s conclusion, and the main character (a pulp fiction writer) claims that fiction should be “all clues and no solutions”. Maybe it’s a deliberate reference.

  5. I seem to be one of the only people who actaully really enjoyed the episode. I thought it it was a fantastic ending to the show. The show ended the same way it began. They resolved nothing – absolutely brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: