A public-private partnership

Today I got a letter on official letterhead from Penny Shakespeare, the Assistant Secretary of the Australian Government’s Department of Health and Ageing: Private Health Insurance Branch [sic].

Dear Mr M J Beggs

You have recently registered as eligible for Medicare and under Medicare you are entitled to free treatment in a public hospital as a public patient. However, many people in Australia also choose to have private health insurance.

Private health insurance gives you more choice in relation to your healthcare – for example, the doctor who treats you, what hospital you go to and whether to be treated as a public or private patient.

Now is a good time to think about private health insurance. You can take out private health insurance at any age, but as a new migrant to Australia there is a benefit in taking it out now if you are over 30 years old….

I wrote about last week about the welfare-industrial complex, but clearly that kind of thing was pioneered in health and is now an enormous business, even in Australia with a relatively decent public health system.

Private healthcare is a cancerous growth on the health system, entirely malignant. Its proponents like to portray it as an ‘extra’ – extra choice, extra resources – but it grows at the expense of the public system because it competes with it for the most scarce resource, medical staff, and makes what it poaches available only to those who can afford it. A health system that relies on private care and insurance is – at best – regressive taxation and blatantly exclusive, not to mention inefficient.

But private healthcare gives governments a solution to a chronic problem. Healthcare costs rise faster than most prices in large part because healthcare is professional labour intensive. As with education, you can’t raise productivity without decreasing quality. Just keeping the same level of care requires an increasing amount of society’s resources. But governments find it difficult or distasteful to raise taxes and expenditure. So the system is increasingly maintained on an exclusive basis by those who have more of society’s resources to command.

 Cross-posted to Australia Watch.

Published in: on 18 June, 2007 at 7:12 pm  Comments (4)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://scandalum.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/a-public-private-partnership/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

4 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. This is exactly the kind of thing I would have liked you to post on AusWatch . . . You can still cross-post it there if you felt like it . ..

  2. Cool, will do… Wasn’t sure about the status of AusWatch and my contributions last year werer few and far between.

  3. I recieved the same letter on the same day as Mike. I have decided that since they believe it is fine to write me and tell me that I should take up wonderful and advantageous private health insurance, I would write to them in the same vein (pun intended) but swap it to public health system. I guess these letters are in line with the recent advertising that I have seen on tv extolling us, the people, to take up private health insurance.

  4. I look forward to getting one if I am ever granted permanent residency.

    Regarding AusWatch, I’d still like to get it running. It’s kind of fucked up because I transferred it to the new Blogger (formerly Blogger Beta) and now the code is all difficult to use. I am unhappy with my attempts to blog at stoush.net and would like to go back to doing something serious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: